HARIAN SRILANKA MENGKHAWATIRKAN IMIGRAN MUSLIM

Biasa khan Muslim? Gak di Birma, di Thailand, di Xinjiang, nggerecokin masyarakat Buddhis setempat, Muslim kini bikin pusing SRILANKA.

HARIAN SRILANKA MENGKHAWATIRKAN IMIGRAN MUSLIM
Shenali Waduge
12 January 2013
http://www.dailynews.lk/2013/01/12/fea03.asp

Rakyat Buddhist Srilanka, atau disebut juga dgn Buddhis Sinhalese, khawatir krn warisan budaya, arkeolig dan monumen2 sejarah Buddhis mereka sedang dihancurkan. Muslim yg tinggal bersama mereak secara damai selama bertahun2 kini sedang diradikalisasi dan mengadopsi sebuah ‘eksklusivitas’ yang nampak dari busana2 wanita yg serba hitam dan menjamurnya madrasah.

Kami, rakyat Buddhis Srilanka khawatir karena:

* Islam adalah suatu cara hidup yg menyatukan komponen2 legal, social, economic, religious, political dan MILITER. Menantang satu komponen akan berakibat pada aktivisasi kesemua komponen guna menyerang mereka yang berani menantangnya.

* munculnya konflik antara hukum Islam (syariah) dgn hukum negara/internasional.

* terciptanya dualisme hukum: satu hukum bagi Muslim dan hukum lain bagi non-Muslim.

* menjamurnya pengadilan2 syariah yang tadinya tidak ada. Kalau Muslim sudah mengikuti hukum Srilanka selama puluhan tahun, mengapa tiba2 mereka kini merasa perlu tunduk pada syariah? Mengapa 9% penduduk harus memiliki hukum terpisah dan bukannya pada hukum Srilanka?

* karena kebebasan terancam begitu hukum (islam) melukai hewan atau orang lain.

* karena tuntutan ekstrimis spt memancarkan doa2 mereka lewat TOA tidak merupakan hak azasi fundamental, krn TOA hanyalah alat elektronik yang merupakan fenomena baru.

Kalau Muslim memang ingin hidup damai dgn penduduk setempat, mengapa mereka menuntut hukum, praktek dan adat yang secara langsung mengakibatkan konflik, padahal kita semua tahu bahwa di negara Islam, minoritas Buddhis tidak memiliki hak apapun.

Kalau Muslim sudah lama makan, menggunakan kosmetik dan telan obat tanpa masalah di Srilanka selama bertahun2 mengapa tiba2 mereka kini perlu sertifikat halal? Dan mengapa ke-90% rakyat Srilanka harus mengongkosi sertifikat macam itu?

Kalau menurut Islam, non-Muslim dianggap kafir dan tidak beragama — persamaan derajad macam apa yg mereka ajarkan?

Ke 9% Muslim Srilanka sudah memiliki hak2 khusus: mereka dilibatkan dalam bendera nasional, hari2 suci Muslim dijadikan hari libur nasional, mereka diberikan tanah khusus dibelahan timur oleh raja Sinhala (tapi ini belum cukup dan kini mereka tuntut otonomi), supermarket2 Muslim tutup bagi solat Jumat dan bahkan Menteri Kehakiman Srilanka seorang Muslim (dan pemimpin partai politik Muslim radikal).

TAPI apa kebebasan yagn ditawarkan Muslim kpd non-Muslims?

* Apakah non-Muslim bisa mewakili diri sendiri dlm pengadilan syariah? Tidak.

* Apakah non-Muslim punya kebebasan beribadah dalam negara Muslim? TIDAK.

* Apakah non-Muslim punya kebebasan beragama spt Muslim (bangun mesjid, meradikalisasi busana, menggunakan TOA, mengorganisasikan konferensi2 akbar)? Bahkan mengunjungi tempat ibadah non-Muslim saja tidak boleh. Apalagi membawa buku2 atau benda2 yang melambangkan agama non-Muslim.

* Muslim di Srilanka membangun mesjid diseluruh negeri dlm jumlah yang jauh lebih banyak dari jumlah populasi Muslim tapi apakah negara2 Muslim mengijinkan kuil2, gereja2 atau sinagog? Kalaupun boleh, ini dengan segala macam persyaratan/pengetatan.

* Muslim Srilanka memiliki kebebasan berekspresi dan mencap Buddhis2 sbg rasis dan ekstrimis dan bahkan Menteri Kehakiman Muslim menyebut bhiksu2 Srilanka sbg ‘teroris berbusana kuning’ – tapi begitu Islam dikritik di Saudi, hukumannya adalah mati dirajam.

* Dimana keadilan hukum jika non-Muslim hanya mendapatkan segelintir dari Muslim dlm sebuah kasus hukum sesuai dgn hk syariah? Bukannya ini tidak adil dlm negara yang mayoritas non-Muslim?

* Muslim Srilanka dengan terbuka hanya menerima buruh Muslim bagi bisnis mereka, tapi mengapa mereka keberatan kalau rakyat Srilanka menuntut agar bisnis2 diskriminatif macam ini diboikot?

* Mengapa kaum fundamentalis Islam menghasut kekerasan terhdp penduduk Buddhis di Srilanka Timur–padahal tanah yg mereka duduki adalah hadiah raja Sinhala– dan kini mereka menghancurkan kelenteng2 Buddhis?

* Kami MERAGUKAN KEDAMAIAN DALAM ISLAM mengingat semua konflik besar di dunia ini berorientasi pada Muslim dan berakhir pada Muslim bunuh Muslim yang jauh lebih berbahaya daripada apa yang dilakukan Barat dengan perang udara (drone) mereka.

The aggressive rise in demands for legal “exclusivity” towards Muslims does not advocate any policy of compromise or peaceful coexistence with other communities and is making not only Sri Lankans to ask what Muslims are really upto but the West is also now asking these same questions!

Why is the West also now concerned about Islamic expansionism?

* If Muslims accuse Israel of influencing politicians, journalists against Muslims what are the Muslims doing with petrodollars in systematically influencing politicians, using international human rights laws to establish Sharia and Islamic extremism in non-Muslim nations in a long-term bid to Islamize them?

* Why Netherlands is a multicultural mess why are all EU nations now reconsidering the dangers “multiculturalism” has brought to their natural citizens?

* Why is UK concerned that Sharia laws have subverted British laws with over 1500 under-age forced marriages taking place (Scotland has banned forced marriage). UK already has 100 Sharia courts (the 1st opened in 2008), honor-based violence even killings (over 2,800 in 2011), female genital mutilation (over 65,000 cases though it is illegal under 2003 Act but no one has been prosecuted)

* Why is Briton ending practice of paying multiple social welfare benefits to Muslim immigrants practicing bigamy/polygamy ( a crime in GB but a special right granted to Muslims under Multiculturalism who demand Sharia laws).

* Why is UK working on a new law to ensure meat slaughtered according to Islamic Sharia law cannot be sold unwitting to public.

* How did Britain end up having more Muslim imams than Christian pastors?

* If UK was worried when towns with large Muslim populations (Birmingham, Derby, Bradford, Dewsbury, Leeds, Liverpool, Luton, Leicester, Manchester, Sheffield, Waltham Forest) demanded Sharia replace UK’s common law in 2011 – should Sri Lanka not worry?

* When Tower Hamlets – an East London Muslim enclave has posters “You are entering a Sharia controlled zone : Islamic rules enforced” – where Imams issue death threats to women who refuse to wear Muslim veils – should that not worry Sri Lanka?

* When UK politicians show Sharia-compliance and when former UK Premier Gordon Brown stated he wanted London to become the Islamic financial capital – should we not worry about what Sri Lanka’s politicians will commit Sri Lanka towards?

It is not Sri Lanka but the West that has come up with four phases to Muslim expansionism:

Phase 1: migration to non-Muslim host country, Keeping low profile, request for humanitarian tolerance, no demands on host nation. When Muslim population are 2 percent they remain peace loving (ex: US, Australia, Canada, Norway, Italy and China – where Muslims follow the One Child Only policy without fuss)

Phase 2: Requests for Muslim representation in all spheres, Request recognition of Sharia law to their community while proselytizing. Openly condemn “radicalism” and organize inter-faith dialogue and events and position Islam as a religion of peace and that Sharia is not a threat by getting uninformed no
n-Muslim leaders to support.

Underground Islamic conversion, indoctrinating Muslim children, calls for hate laws to silence critics, plan to enlarge Muslim populations, assassination of critics (Theo van Gogh murder in Netherlands for insulting Islam). More than 2 percent of the population means a converting drive (ex: Germany, Denmark, UK, Spain, Thailan)

Phase 3: When Muslim populations reach significant minority they apply “penetration” – lobbying governments, creating radical political parties and candidates, filing lawsuits against “Islamophobia” pressing for special privileges for Muslims in public establishments, request turns to demand for Sharia laws, undermining host government, ridiculing majority host religion and culture, using their economic hold to ransom, even “moderate” Muslims are murdered, restricting Muslim women, holding Government to ransom by bargaining, More than 5% excessive influence – pushing for Islamic laws, Halal etc (ex: Sweden, France, Switzerland, Netherlands, Trinidad and Tobago)

Phase 4: Islamic “theocracy” declared. Muslims gain control of a nation, imposes Sharia law, engages in violence with non-Islamic religions, all non-Islamic human rights cancelled, freedom of speech, press, religion cancelled, all non-Muslim culture and symbols destroyed. More than 10 percent – lawlessness (ex: France)

The website www.thereligionofpeace.com keeps track of the number of violent jihad attacks.

It has become a practice for both Muslims and Tamils to hide their follies and wrongs behind the cry of “ethnic discrimination”, “hate campaigns” to cover up accusations made against them.

It has worked well to camouflage their ulterior motives by internationally promoting Sinhalese Buddhist as “extremists” and using the power of money to spread the news via media.

It has been convenient to quote “compassion” of Buddhism and ridicule Buddhists when they attempt to stop Islamic expansionism by bring the truth to the public.
Radical Islam

Whatever theories or excuses that is being propagated for the growing resentment, the Muslims cannot disagree that there is an underground plan as well as an open strategy to exercise Muslim domination over non-Muslim nations – it is the Muslims who need to step back and digest the accusations and decide to peacefully coexist with the other communities while ceasing to demand exclusive status for Muslims.

Many Muslims in Sri Lanka while practicing their religion have not been practicing radical Islam. It is only these people who can claim to be living in peace with all communities of Sri Lanka.

The radicals cannot use these Muslims as a camouflage to pretend to be living in peace while carrying out a totally conflicting agenda. Many Muslims donate blood when it is against their faith to do so, a large number partake liquor and smoking – many of these innocent vices are all taboo when full Sharia comes into effect and Muslims in Sri Lanka may like to ponder how drastically their lives are likely to change and all they need to do is to see how disastrous the lives of Libyans, Iraqi’s, Afghans, a host of Sharia following African nations and now Egyptians are.

Like the West, Sri Lanka is concerned about the growing influence of extremist elements of Islam taking over the moderate Muslims who had been living peacefully in Sri Lanka because “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it” (Recep Erdogan – Turkey PM)

As the author and historian Serge Trifkovic states: “The refusal of the Western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.” – we can say the same of Sri Lanka’s politicians.

The Sri Lankan leaders could have nipped the LTTE factor but it didn’t and that led to 30 years of conflict.

If Sri Lanka’s leaders do not address this radicalism that will affect all Sri Lankans including the moderate Muslims we are looking at deeper ramifications for the entire nation and the extinction of an already endangered ethnic group.

EMAIL | PRINTABLE VIEW | FEEDBACK |

Faithfreedom Indonesia
Faithfreedom forum static

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

%d blogger menyukai ini: